this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
82 points (98.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7217 readers
127 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
82
US prisoners are part of a hidden workforce linked to hundreds of popular food brands (abcnews.go.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Leg 30 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Slaves. They're slaves.

[–] LEDZeppelin 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why is it so hard for these fucking journalists to call things for what they are?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

because they dont want to badmouth the system too much

[–] bhmnscmm 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Section 1 of the 13th amendment.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

What a farce.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Here, you see exactly why we don’t seen release of petty drug possession prisoners, just as few as possible to be performative.

For-profit prisons shouldn’t exist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I agree with the sentiment, the way for-profit prisons exist today shouldn't exist. But I disagree with the implication that ethical for-profit prisons can't exist.

For-profit prisons today are paid based on number of people incarcerated. They don't control the incarceration process, so the most profitable option is to keep nonviolent prisoners there as long as possible, which means no early release and extensions on sentences due to "bad" behavior. If they can get cheap labor out of them, that's just a cherry on top.

The problem is with incentives, not profit motive. If we incentivize correction (early release) instead of incarceration, we'll get different results. So we should be paying based on capacity, with a bonus for low recidivism. If we do that, I think we'll see real innovation.