Technology

59710 readers

5789 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

430

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s to c/technology

396 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dragontamer 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And my argument is that Midjourney's servers are engaged in illegal copying. So I think your point is moot. Not the Web Browsers downloading images.

The movie Joker's image is being copied each time the training weights are copied to a new server. Is that not an illegal copy?

[–] Jilanico 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When you look at a picture of the joker online, your browser is caching an image file of the joker on your computer. Is that not an illegal copy?

[–] dragontamer 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What the hell is this non-sequitur?

What do browser caches have to do with Midjourney servers and training weights?

I get that you wanna change the subject. But I dunno if it's because you don't understand my argument, or if you've realized that my argument is solid and therefore you have no actual counterargument.

The copy that people care about are the webservers. That's why when you run Bittorrent, MPAA or RAII sue the people serving the data. Not the people who use the data. Have you followed any copyright case in the last two or three decades? In this case, it'd be a copyright case vs Midjourney servers.

[–] Jilanico 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I really do not believe midjourney is storing all the files on the Internet in a humongous database. They are just exposing the AI to them for training just like you expose your computer to them when you visit with your web browser. I'm happy to be wrong about this, but I'm just not convinced. Please try to keep your temper.

[–] dragontamer 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I really do not believe midjourney is storing all the files on the Internet in a humongous database.

Are you sure?

The training weights can literally recreate images its been trained on. That makes them a humongous database, albeit with lossy compression. They aren't replicated exactly, but they are replicated enough that I'm confident that these "Joker" images passes as copyright infringement before a jury (ie: is substantially similar).

[–] Jilanico 1 points 10 months ago

That makes them a humongous database

I understand why you're saying that, but I personally don't agree. As AIs face legal challenges, maybe your opinion will be adopted, we'll see.