Technology

59676 readers

4636 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

430

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s to c/technology

396 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ross_audio 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately I have studied this.

So we'll just have to decide to agree to disagree and hope neither ends up on the wrong side of the law.

Like I say. Copyright is based upon damage to the copyright holder. It's quite obvious when that happens and it's hard to do enough as an individual to be worth suing.

But making a single copy without permission, without being covered by any exemptions, is copyright infringement.

Copy right. The right to copy.

You don't have it unless you pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In my country we can draw anything and not get sued or break the law. I think that's pretty good too. It's when you sell stuff you get into those things.

[–] Ross_audio 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If your country is a signatory to the international copyright treaties with most of the Anglosphere (Like the EU, US, AUS, NZ). Then that is not correct.

You cannot draw anything.

It's just never worth suing you over.

A crime so small it's irrelevant is almost a legal act. But it's not actually a legal act.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't know what to say. I'm in Sweden. We can draw things for ourselves and no international international company may sue us

It's illegal to have crimes so small and threat to take personal drawings in fact would break several other Swedish laws