this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
673 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60085 readers
4929 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

George Carlin Estate Files Lawsuit Against Group Behind AI-Generated Stand-Up Special: ‘A Casual Theft of a Great American Artist’s Work’::George Carlin's estate has filed a lawsuit against the creators behind an AI-generated comedy special featuring a recreation of the comedian's voice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The appellate court ruled that the voice of someone famous as a singer is distinctive to their person and image and therefore, as a part of their identity, it is unlawful to imitate their voice without express consent and approval. The appellate court reversed the district courts decision and ruled in favor of Midler, indicating her voice was protected against unauthorized use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midler_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

I don't see why that wouldn't apply to a comedian as well.

[–] wikibot 2 points 11 months ago

Here's the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

Midler v. Ford Motor Co. , 849 F. 2d 460 (9th Cir. 1988) is a United States Court of Appeals case in which Bette Midler sought remedy against Ford Motor Company for a series of commercials in the 1980s which used a Midler impersonator.

^to^ ^opt^ ^out^^,^ ^pm^ ^me^ ^'optout'.^ ^article^ ^|^ ^about^

[–] ClamDrinker 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The court might rule in favor of his estate for this reason. But honestly, I do think there are differences to a singer (whose voice becomes an instrument in their song) and a comedian (whose voice is used to communicate the ideas and jokes they want to tell). A different voice could tell the same jokes as Carlin, and if done with the same level of care to communicate his emotions and cadence, could effectively create the same feeling as we know it. A song could literally be a different song if you swap an instrument. But the courts will have to rule.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Carlin had a unique and distinctive voice and cadence, which was absolutely part of his act. And this fake album imitates it.

[–] ClamDrinker 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't disagree with that, but such differences can matter when it comes to ruling if imitation and parody are allowed, and to what extent.