this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
317 points (97.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43950 readers
120 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every day there’s more big job cuts at tech and games companies. I’ve not seen anything explaining why they all seam to be at once like this. Is it coincidence or is there something driving all the job cuts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Lots of tech companies saw huge growth during covid thanks to everyone having extra money to spend (see crypto and NFTs if you want clear examples that we just had too much laying around).

Many of these companies then saw their revenue and userbase increase month-after-month and thought the growth was going to continue forever (or, more cynically, they knew it was going to crash but acted like it was going to continue). This led to a bunch of hires to "drive growth."

But obviously, pandemic spending habits have mostly stopped, and the money faucet is being turned off. Companies can't afford all the workers they hired, so they're "let go due to market downturns."

TL;DR Companies either thought they were going to have unrealistic growth and made dumb hiring decisions, or knew the growth was going to end and thus made cruel hiring decisions.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt 7 points 10 months ago

The correction I would make is that they can afford the workers. But the leadership needs to continue the growth. All they have left is to cut expenses, and the easiest way to do that is layoffs.

[–] olympicyes 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Add something about the federal funds rate exceeding 2.5% for the first time since 2008 and you’re on the right track. I think interest rates affect startups more than Google so bigger tech firms were hoarding talent to prevent new competitors from having those workers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I think interest rates affect startups more than Google so bigger tech firms

Definitely. Google has lots of cash already, whereas startups are often in need of more money.

The other thing that's happened recently is that businesses used to be able to write off (deduct in their tax return) all their R&D expenses in the year they were incurred, whereas now they need to be amortized over five years. This has a huge impact to startups because a lot of their initial work is R&D, and now they have much larger tax bills than they used to have. https://www.axios.com/2024/01/20/taxes-irs-startups-section174

[–] weeeeum 1 points 10 months ago

An additional factor is that a ton of tech companies aren't even profitable. Twitter and twitch are both very well known to be unprofitable and there are many more that are probably unprofitable. Aside from social media, things like Uber, Lyft and many more are unprofitable.

Even YouTube might not be profitable, Google only posts revenue from the platform, NEVER profits. YouTube's also desperate for money, blocking adblock, making YouTube premium, trying to shove it down our throats and all of the shitty, scammy, ads they accept because they're so desperate.

All of these massive companies had tons of venture capital poured into them to grow the platform, THEN be profitable. Then AI came around and investment priorities changed, leaving many tech companies in the dust. Plus a lot of investors are losing hope, since many of these companies have existed for some 15 years without a cent to show for it.