this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
777 points (97.8% liked)

Funny

6900 readers
493 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (35 children)

Republicans: "We'd win a 2nd civil war, we have all the guns!"

Bitch, do you think your civilian small-arms could stand against the full military might of the federal government!? Not even saying it's a good thing...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Historically yes, an uprising of civilians has a great chance at asymmetrical warfare on their own turf.

You can’t destroy your own infrastructure like you can someone else’s.

Will they win? Almost certainly not.

Can they force some concessions? Probably

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they secdee it is not "your own infrastructure" for the main country anymore.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It is though, they will still want to just reconquer and reconcile

[–] RealFknNito 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They'd pull punches but lets not kid ourselves, Texas is not going to last very long against checks notes the entire United States military

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Honestly though, gutting the infra and starting from scratch would likely be the better choice in the end.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They wouldn't stand a chance. They're power grid is so brittle. The US military would destroy it probably within minutes of an actual war being started. The people who can't stand the heat or the cold (depending on the time of year) would turn on them so quickly.

Just like the south in the civil war, they don't have the infrastructure for the logistics needed to fight a war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

You know unless the struggle is within the us military or the military wont get involved

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It wouldn't happen like that. We would have an insurgency and lots of terrorist attacks. You would have towns and areas that are under insurgent control, with reprisal killings at night. Shit like that. I can't tell you to take it seriously, but you ought to at least consider how it would actually look if it happened.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
  1. It's not going to happen
  2. If it did, they would lose

That doesn't mean I don't take it seriously. We already have electrical substations getting shot by "Y'all-Qaeda"...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Well even if they lose, I'm sure that won't be much comfort to the good people they kill along the way. I just don't think we should be glib at the thought of open civil conflict. Looking at it this way convinced me that I don't want to be without the means to defend myself and my loved ones in the event our "cold" civil war suddenly becomes "hot".

[–] kromem 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It really depends on what would be happening in the military and intelligence services.

I don't think people really understand just how much a civil conflict would be a war of information as opposed to a war of arms.

If things got bad enough domestically that laws like the Patriot Act were expanded and agencies that haven't been supposed to operate domestically suddenly could, and those agencies were still 100% under government control, you'd have vans (or simply drones) taking out domestic terrorists in the middle of the night right before the day they were supposed to organize to kill and terrorize their neighbors.

The US could become an almost unthinkable police state under the control of a government like China's or if we had a Stalin-esque administration.

This is the part that Y'all Queda don't fully grasp. They aren't hiding out in caves in Afghanistan or air gapped in Pakistan. The only thing keeping them safe from the monsters under their bed that they largely don't realize are there is the very government they think would be such a bright idea to try to overthrow. And if that government saw them as enough of an existential threat to unleash the monsters on them, well, they'd have quickly succeeded in overthrowing the US government in a sense, but wouldn't be around to see it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

"The government" isn't a monolith. It is made up of human beings with differing political opinions. US military assets are spread all around the country. US intelligence agencies are full of people that would prefer the far right to the far left. I think you are also overestimating the power of intelligence agencies.

load more comments (32 replies)