this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
67 points (94.7% liked)

Gaming

2160 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
 

Palworld is an alternate take on Pokémon at a time when the colossal franchise feels stagnant and slow

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almar_quigley 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The hype around this game is really weird. I played it and thought it was really janky and unfun but what’s weirder is so many people loving the game but not complaining about the price tag for a game in preview.

[–] glimse 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like people have different tastes in games...

Elden Ring was insanely popular and I didn't like it at all. Doesn't mean the hype was invalid, it just wasn't for me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

No! You're not allowed to like games I don't like!

[–] BleakBluets 6 points 5 months ago

It is insane to me that people defend this game. Ten years ago this game would have been dismissed as survival-crafting shovelware (although GameFreak's lastest entries haven't been much more polished).

Palworld is only superficially similar to Pokémon, but people treat it like it's a logical evolution to Pokémon's game design. I thought I was going insane, but I think I am now realizing that I am old and out of touch.

P.S. There is nothing wrong with liking survival-crafting as a genre (I adore Minecraft myself), I just think this game overly relies on addictive design and isn't particularly deep or unique mechanically.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean 30 bucks seems pretty standard. Actually the same price as ARK which also was an early access title at that time which increased its price to 60 once it released. Especially after the kicker that ARK got a bloody dlc while it was still in early access.

[–] Zahille7 5 points 5 months ago

To be fair, there were more like 2 or 3 DLCs for Ark before it officially released