this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
3288 points (94.9% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19254 readers
2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

[email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatGirlKylie 82 points 1 year ago (3 children)

WAIT! NOT LIKE THAT THOUGH! IT WAS ONLY SUPPOSED TO KEEP THE GAYS OUT!

/s

But that's one way to do it. No churches, no religious people, no trump supporters, no republicans allowed at all. Give them a taste of their own medicine.

[–] dimlo 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the time when business should all be politicalised and I love it.

[–] ThatGirlKylie 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

we need a religion that will make it so that you can't believe in Christianity, republicans, trump supporters, etc.. so that way we can claim it espouses our religious beliefs, just like that chucklefuck web designer said. This way we can be protected under this new ruling.

[–] tburkhol 29 points 1 year ago

My brand of humanism forbids me from interacting with liars and proponents of bad faith. aka: don't feed the trolls. Christians citing the bible in bad faith; right wing nut-jobs citing the constitution in bad faith; SCOTUS citing religious persecution or reverse racism in bad faith..

[–] ThePantser 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We do, its atheism. "I don't believe in your belief, so gtfo"

[–] ThatGirlKylie 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is Atheism considered an organized religion though? Sincerely asking because someone mention that yesterday and it got me thinking, would Atheism actually be protected under religious freedom laws?

[–] Nefara 11 points 1 year ago

That's kind of what the Satanic Temple is for. It's an atheist organization but fulfills the "requirements" of a religion so that it can be protected under the first amendment

[–] maxxxxpower 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ThatGirlKylie 1 points 1 year ago

Definitely been a pastafarian since MySpace days :D

[–] leapingleopard 12 points 1 year ago

it's almost like a leopard ate their face. I have a relevant user name already., yay!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

People can do that now, but only for occupations that qualify as "speech". Owners of "public businesses" (i.e. places that you can walk in to) still aren't allowed to forbid entry to people arbitrarily.