this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
146 points (91.5% liked)

Comic Strips

13841 readers
3524 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Artist: B. Kliban

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ConstipatedWatson 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm sorry, I don't get it.

Can somebody explain it?

I want to understand it because I love elephants (and mammoths as a consequence, though perhaps the type of animal is not important for the joke)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm in the same boat.

...Maybe we're just trying too hard and it's a Cow tools moment?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The joke I think is that she seriously underestimated the task. This is the moment where she's realizing "Well, that didn't work" while the mammoth is still processing that a tiny woman has apparently stabbed it and will presumably kill her in a second.

[–] HollandJim 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not necessarily a woman - it’s just primitive clothing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

True. I was just judging by the way Gary Larson tends to draw cave women vs cave men. Obviously, since this isn't made by Garry Larson, they could very well have intended it to be a man or even gender neutral.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought it was “Woman being a pain in the ass since the dawn of man.”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hyuk Hyuk! wiFe bAd, aMiRiTe?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My best-guess interpretation: "This human is history (doomed) because they tried to attack a large animal and no longer have a weapon."

[–] ConstipatedWatson 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks! That makes sense!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Best case, this is an absurd warning about hunting large animals on one's own. The humour would be that this woman, rather than killing the mammoth, is about to get stomped. Or a at the very least, a terse "Do you mind?"

Worst case, this is intended as "Strong independent (cave)woman don't need no (cave)man.", and in acting without said man, she has proven said maxim wrong.

I'd like to think there's enough wrong with that thinking that even the most ardent misogynist ought to find a step too far (people hunt in groups, so she would have taken friends along, surely?), so I expect the intended humour is closer to the former than the latter.

The choice of a female protagonist is an interesting one though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It must have been "Do you mind?". And absurdness of hunting alone. Also i see nothing interesting on choice of female protagonist. Contrary to popular myth, women hunted together with men (based on evidence of broken legs) and had no strongly separate roles (like women being gatherers and men hunters).

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 year ago

That's how I interpreted it.

[–] ConstipatedWatson 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks! That makes sense!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought it was “Woman being a pain in the ass since the dawn of man.”

[–] HollandJim 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wasn’t funny the first time either. Welcome to my blocklist.

Edit: looked at their post history. Not a moment too soon.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

👍, I really don’t care about your opinion.