this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
75 points (92.1% liked)

World News

37362 readers
2186 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A draft copy of the new National Defense Industrial Strategy says American companies can’t build weapons fast enough to meet global demand.

America’s defense industry is struggling to achieve the kind of speed and responsiveness to stay ahead in a high-tech arms race with competitors such as China, an unreleased draft of a new Pentagon report on the defense industry warns.

The first ever National Defense Industrial Strategy, which is set to be released in the coming weeks by Pentagon acquisition chief William LaPlante, is meant to be a comprehensive look at what the Pentagon needs in order to tap into the expertise of small tech firms, while funding and supporting traditional companies to move faster to develop new tech.

As it stands now, the U.S. defense industrial base “does not possess the capacity, capability, responsiveness, or resilience required to satisfy the full range of military production needs at speed and scale,” according to a draft version of the report, obtained by POLITICO.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

stop tryin? can we move on from producing human killing devices?

[–] Cinner 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sure. Done. Welcome to the United States of China.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yep, its all or nothing, right?

we either have to blow more money than we could possibly spend on saving humans on the production of killing of human devices for 'defense'

we have to spend more than our next 20 allies 'Combined' for our 'defense'. right.

we have to create jhuman killing devices and sell them all over the planet to other countries for our defense. right.

cuz right now our priority is spending trillions of dollars to protect us from no one that can invade us ... cept china, who already indicates they dont want a ww3. totally worth it

[–] Cinner -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dunno, you're the one that insinuated the nothing bit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

fair, but misses the point

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Problem is, do you really want China as the military superpower?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

i think one of the primary purposes of the military should be to find ways to no longer need a military.

not to justify its own existence by becoming a glorified welfare program for companies and humans that cant do something constructive.

the world is changing. colonialism is dead

i do not fear china, no

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i do not fear china, no

That's nice. Unfortunately, all their neighbours do.

i think one of the primary purposes of the military should be to find ways to no longer need a military.

How exactly would the military ever accomplish that? That's a task for the non-military side to accomplish.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

if it is not part of your mandate to not exist, you will find ways to make sure you always exist. "the military" is a necessary evil. not sure about you, but i think we should be working to remove evil.. even in-house.

the trillion dollar military is not even kind of right-sized for the actual threats to our country. its so grossly over-sized it is hard to fathom.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

How, exactly, would the military find a way to remove the need for a military? Short of world domination, and even then they'd still need the military force to stay in power. You can't make a mandate when there's no reasonable route to accomplishing it.