Europe

8324 readers

1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Germany, which committed genocide in Namibia, blasted for defending Israel by African nation - UPI.com (www.upi.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

archive link

Namibian President Hage G. Geingob blasted Germany on Saturday for defending Israel at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, pointing to the genocide Germany itself perpetrated on Namibians in the early 1900s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JayObey711 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Pledging loyalty to Israel and recognizing that Israel has a right to exist sound like very different things to me. Don't get me wrong this change is dangerous but not for the reasons you think. It shows how AFD managed to push right wing ideas into the mainstream.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The segment of DW above was like a response to this comment:

Right, because Germany is acting so awfully one-sided.

Since Germany has not even recognized the right to exist of Palestine, having to recognize the right of existence of Israel in order to get a citizenship, seems to me awfully one-sided.

If I understand correctly it is still a debate. A one-sided, one.

Also in relation to your comment:

Pledging loyalty to Israel and recognizing that Israel has a right to exist sound like very different things to me.

The way I see it, it's more "Pledging loyalty to Israel by recognizing that Israel has a right to exist"

[–] JayObey711 1 points 10 months ago

That's all correct and I agree with you on these points. What I'm trying to say is that this change is (I think, not 100% sure because I wasn't in the room of course) made to combat "imported antisemitism" wich is a different "issue" from the Israel situation entirely. There would not have to be a recognition to the right to exist for Palestine because they are not receiving the type of discrimination by imigrants the Jewish community does.