this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
580 points (95.9% liked)

People Twitter

5367 readers
1611 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Uh there's zero chance these big techs are selling voices like this. Also, this sounds very targeted and planned, so there must be more context to this. Also, why the hell are they on bluesky?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

They're on BlueSky because there are more people there that would actually believe this total load of bullshit. Plenty of scams that will claim to be vague family member (no names; just like "son" or "daughter," "aunt" or "uncle") but highly unlikely they're getting an AI to mimic your voice. Just like vagueness of the family member they claim to be, the voices used may coincidentally sound similar.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because its probably the best twitter alternative

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] thawed_caveman 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bluesky is more usable than Mastodon purely because it doesn't use a decentralized model. Sure it defeats the purpose, but on the plus side it removes some serious inconveniences that the true fediverse comes with, for example i've never been on Bluesky and found myself unable to upvote someone because i've accidentally left my instance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] thawed_caveman 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah but who owns the servers currently running it? If it's decentralized but the same entity owns all the servers, then it's not decentralized. Seems obvious

[–] ZombieTheZombieCat 4 points 11 months ago

I wish I were this naive

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Oh they totally are. Maybe not this directly, but there is an awful depth to the data market. One company may be selling to the next and the next and you end up with companies just buying all the data they can to sell police surveillance software running off of fucking Candy Crush telemetry.