this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
216 points (82.7% liked)

World News

39406 readers
2549 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] McDropout 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It’s a Qatari institution with clear bias. Just because it has “Arab” in the name doesn’t mean it represents all arabs. There are many institutions in the middle east with “arab” in the title, they don’t represent us all.

Just a reminder that Aljazeera is a Qatari state owned channels, and Qatar represented Palestine in the opening for Asia’s cup just yesterday.

But yea… good journalism.

[–] Rapidcreek 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The 8000 respondents, from 16 different countries,

[–] McDropout -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

8000 respondents, given that they’re a fair sample size from each arab-majority country (which I doubt) do not represent what 464 million arabs think.

That’s 0.0001724138% of the population.

[–] Imhotep 10 points 11 months ago

your comment shows us you don't know how polls are made

why not look it up first and only then comment (if relevant)

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] McDropout -4 points 11 months ago

Maybe include that it is a poll of “~5700 arabs by Qatari institutions” in the title, not “67% of arabs”.

Misleading title. Sorry to see individuals like you on Lemmy rather than Reddit.

[–] guacupado 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You definitely haven't taken stats.

[–] Aceticon 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Whilst it's quite amazing just how few people you need in your sample to get a +/- 3% error with a 95% confidence for the opinion of hundreds of millions, that narrow error margin with just a few thousand samples only works if the sample is representative of the population in general, which is unclear.

Plenty of cases of polls out there that are complete total bollocks because they were taken by calling by phone people in relativelly poor countries were only those in the middle class and above have a phone, and at times when most people were out working, so they ended up sampling an atypical subset of people rather than one representative of the whole society.

The way the question is posed also influences the results, sometimes quite subtly (the mere order or words or order of questions in multiple-question poll can sway the results).

So whilst what you said makes sense in response to the previous commenter's point, there's a lot more to good polling than merelly the number of samples necessary for a certain error margin in the 95% confidence interval when your sampling is random in a uniform distribution (emphasys on the later, as actually making sure the sampling is indeed like that in practice is often difficult and/or costly)

[–] hark 1 points 11 months ago

Just like the polls done by those who "know stats" who predicted a clinton win in 2016.