this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
1074 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59120 readers
4532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1074
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Gemini24601 to c/technology
 

Everyone can agree on VLC being the best video player, right? Game developers can agree on it too, since it is a great utility for playing multimedia in games, and/or have a video player included. However, disaster struck; Unity has now banned VLC from the Unity Store, seemingly due to it being under the LGPL license which is a "Violation of section 5.10.4 of the Provider agreement." This is a contridiction however. According to Martin Finkel in the linked article, "Unity itself, both the Editor and the runtime (which means your shipped game) is already using LGPL dependencies! Unity is built on libraries such as Lame, libiconv, libwebsockets and websockify.js (at least)." Unity is swiftly coming to it's demise.

Edit: link to Videolan Blog Post: https://mfkl.github.io/2024/01/10/unity-double-oss-standards.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rivermonster 146 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Wait, people are still using Unity after they clearly demonstrated they'll fuck you on a whim? Honestly, seems like everyone's been given a fair warning about dealing with these scumbags. I get migrating a codebase is a motherfucker, and sometimes it is even easier to redevelop much or all of the project. But again, if you're renting retail space from someone who is a psychopath, bipolar, and an arsonist (Unity in this case), and they might burn your shop down at any moment, sometimes you gotta move!

[–] douglasg14b -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Uh.... Ofc they are?

Even after all this I'm about to start a new game using unity. Why?

Because there's no way I can bring it to market with the ecosystems available in any other major engine given the type of game that it is. I've already prototyped for almost a year using various options to narrow it down.

I would be forced to build so much from scratch for the mapping tech that I'd never ship it in say Godot.

Do I want to use unity? Hell no, but am I going to give up on my dream because screw unity? Hell no. I'm not into pyric victories.

[–] RockHornet 3 points 9 months ago

There are a lot of ways to bring a game to market without Unity or Unreal. But if you can't envision doing an input mapping system yourself just stop right now. It's only going to get worse, engine or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)