this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
719 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59703 readers
5399 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
719
Twitter locked behind login page. (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/technology
140 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So today I clicked a twitter link because companies like to use it for official announcements, only to be greeted with a login page. Was annoyed then I remembered nitter exists. It just prompted me to install Privacy Redirect which I should have done ages ago.

Github: https://github.com/SimonBrazell/privacy-redirect

Chrome Web Store: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/privacy-redirect/pmcmeagblkinmogikoikkdjiligflglb/related

Firefox Browser Add-ons: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/privacy-redirect/

Looks like twitter waited for the reddit API changes to do push this change to try to do it under the radar.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Willer 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

beeing monolithic is not bad, its just an issue when its not FOSS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FOSS monoliths can still be bad, see red hat hiding its source code

[–] hark 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't hiding source code disqualify the OS portion of FOSS?

[–] Contravariant 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You'd think, but apparently they hadn't taken into account that someone would sell GPL licensed software and then simply instruct their customers that they had the right to publish the source code while simultaneously reminding them that red hat had the right to reject their custom should they choose to exercise this right.