this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
25 points (85.7% liked)

politics

19664 readers
4591 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not only is Chris Christie the only Republican who understands he is running against Trump, he’s the only candidate who comes close to matching him as an entertainer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ggBarabajagal 9 points 2 years ago

I agree.

Christie knows that we know that he knows that he has essentially no chance of winning the '24 GOP nomination. That's not why he's running. As he's (overdramatically but not inaccurately) said himself, he's running to "save his party."

Christie knows that there's tons of money and power in Republican politics that's all still going to be there if-slash-when Trump's influence falls. Those GOP donors with all that money and power know that Trump's chances against Biden in the '24 general are already worse than they were in '20.

The GOP donors with the money, as well as the GOP politicians who know how to spend it to best serve the GOP, they all already see that Trump is a bad investment. While they're stuck waiting for the GOP electorate to catch up with that idea -- while they're waiting for Trump to lose, again, one way or another -- they might as well try to better position themselves to win next time around.

If-slash-when the influence of Trump's extremism finally falls, the GOP could be well served by adopting a more moderate, civil-libertarian, anti-authoritarian, neoliberal (or at least flag-waving necon) image. An image that looks like Asa Hutchinson, maybe.

For now though, Christie looks like exactly the guy they need, to plant the seed of an idea in the American subconscious: that "GOP" does not have to mean the same thing as "MAGA" henceforth and forevermore.

Christie is smart, shrewd, and mean. He knows how politics works and he knows how Trump works. I disagree with Christie's positions on many issues, and I disdain his scandalous behavior while governor, but I agree with him 100% when it comes to favoring a constitutional democratic republic over a fascist-y authoritarian kleptocracy.

I sincerely hope he continues to poll at the percentages he'll need to get on the debate stage.