this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
136 points (87.0% liked)

Science Fiction

13673 readers
253 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We took a trip through decades of the genre and came up with a list of the most important and best hard science fiction movies of all time. They are the essence and the foundations of the book of sci-fi rules that's still being written as we, the audience, become much more self-aware of our relationship with technology, the future, and whatever those two will bring.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFKBRBChocolate -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's been a long time since I've seen it. I don't remember loving the movie, but I thought it got kudos for getting the physics right. No?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They flew from the Hubble Space Telescope to the ISS using a Manned Maneuvering Unit, nothing about that is "getting the physics right".

[–] Landmammals 7 points 10 months ago

The part that had me screaming at the TV was where George clooney's character and Sandra Bullock's character were tethered together. There are attached to the space station via straps. George Clooney releases the clip and immediately goes flying off into space. There's no spinning, nothing at all pulling him away. If he unclipped, he would just hang there.

I'm not trying to be a stickler here, but if you're making a movie about space following the basic details of how things move around in space is kind of important.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The media got paid for writing positive stuff about it. It was a really shitty movie and I will never understand it's high rating in my life...

George Clooney was actually super annoying in it too. It was like putting the Oceans 11 character in a space suit with no changes in personality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Both of them had no real personality in the whole movie, it was carried by CGI all in all.

[–] Landmammals 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe you're thinking of interstellar. They got a lot of kudos for the work they did imagining what a black hole would actually look like.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I might be conflating them? I saw both for sure. The more I'm thinking about Gravity, the more I'm remembering stuff that pissed me off. I'm also remembering a book where a woman astronaut gets stuck out in space and has to throw something to move the other way - maybe it was in Sevenes? I don't know, I read a lot of SF and sometimes it runs together.

[–] Landmammals 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could the book have been Gravity? There was an unrelated book with that title about a woman in space

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 1 points 10 months ago

Hmmm, no, I don't think so, but good guess

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

For me it was just the sheer improbability of getting out alive. Missions to space are about precision and there's no room for error. I figure that anyone on the ISS will be on the escape module before such relatively large detectable debris even hits. The film was a bit of a dramatisation to say the least.