PC Gaming

8299 readers

224 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

136

NCSoft has granted the 'Private' homecoming server City of Heroes devs a license to host the game legally. (forums.homecomingservers.com)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The private servers have been up a while. But it is always hard for fan projects to gain traction for devs, players, or donations, when the IP could be yanked at any time. NCSoft granting a license should provide one heck of a shot in the arm for this cult classic game.

Go. Hunt. KILL Skul!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TootSweet 45 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Ah. Ok. So if I'm understanding right, NCSoft wrote City of Heroes (both client and server) and somehow the proprietary server source code was leaked. Some folks unaffiliated with NCSoft took the leaked server code and set up a server named "Homecoming." And rather than sue the fuck out of them (as is very normal in these situations), NCSoft worked out a license deal with the Homecoming team to allow Homecoming to be. Did I get all that right?

Very cool. Seems like just the sort of win-win kind of solution holders of intellectual property are usually too fucking rabid to allow to happen.

[–] steakmeout 7 points 8 months ago

Published by NCSoft, developed by Cryptic.

[–] cryptiod137 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Eh, if the code was leaked it was going to be used, so now they can say that anyone using the code needs to make an agreement to do so, which they can probably pull at any time.

[–] TootSweet 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Still probably better than slapping them with a lawsuit.

Not to say I wouldn't prefer they just put the leaked source code under the GPL or something. But it's better than just being assholes because they can.

It is possible NCSoft is getting something out of this, though. More control over how third-party servers do things or some such.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

They gain some protection for the brand and retain the trademarks associated with it by licensing instead of ignoring, and get this for free vs the ongoing expense in private server whackamole.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They could already trivially shut down anyone using stolen code to host servers.

This doesn't enhance that case at all.

[–] cryptiod137 -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The most interested and able people to run the code would be cut off, and are likely now known by name to the companies legal staff.

It's a random server hosted somewhere in the Midwest vs John and Jacob Smith in Michigan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But licensing this has literally zero impact on their ability to take action against that random server.

They have the exact same options available to them.

[–] cryptiod137 -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That would imply they actually know where the server is being run and by who without taking legal action.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

No it doesn't. This doesn't change that.