this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
36 points (97.4% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

903 readers
32 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers find that while alcohol impairs face symmetry detection, it does not influence judgments of attractiveness.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But the study, published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology, found that while alcohol did impair face symmetry detection, it did not influence judgments of attractiveness.

"One possible explanation for the effect is that alcohol impairs the drinker's ability to detect facial asymmetry, thus making potential partners more visually appealing.

"There are a range of possible reasons why alcohol drinkers are more inclined to engage in sex, including a lack of inhibition, heightened expectations, personality traits, and the beer goggles effect.

Read more from Sky News:Two men killed in Croydon fireNew Years Honours list revealedUK braces for more extreme weather

He said: "We don't deny the existence of a 'beer goggles' effect but we suspect it would be more easily detectable when using live models for an experiment, instead of static photographs.

"Images conceal a range of important visual criteria for attractiveness, including build, body shape, height, expression, and clothing.


The original article contains 402 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!