United States | News & Politics

7217 readers

107 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

220

30 Percent of Americans Believe Trump Appointed President by God (www.rawstory.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

125 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why do so many evangelical Christians support former President Donald Trump despite his decades of documented ungodly behavior?

An in-depth report from The Economist shows that it has a simple explanation: They believe that God personally appointed him to rule the United States.

In fact, the report cites a survey conducted by Denison University political scientist Paul Djupe that around 30 percent of Americans believe Trump "was anointed by God to become president."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Look I am not going to argue theology with you, especially when you just ignore the points I made and pretend they dont exist.

The fact of the matter is the Bible is so full of vague and contradictory statements that it can /and has/ been used to argue basically for or against pretty much every position imaginable.

So I guess have fun with your particular cherry picked version of Christianity: They're all logically inconsistent if you examine them seriously, and I do not care to prove this to a person who explains their position by just ignoring contradictions that are inconvenient for them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Yes, there are contradictions, but the one you pointed out is easily explained by pretty much every Christian understanding of the relationship between what Jesus taught and what's in the Old Testament.

So pulling something from Leviticus is irrelevant because that's "the old law" that Jesus came to fulfill. That's like Christianity 101 and one of the few things most denominations agree on.

My personal explanation for the rest of the inconsistencies are losses in translation. The New Testament was preserved by monks transcribing documents by hand, and those monks had a set of existing theological beliefs, so it's highly likely they would prefer a certain wording based on those beliefs. However, I highly doubt things were particularly organized in that translation process, hence the weird inconsistencies (e.g. are Jesus and God the same being, or different?) that tends to result in different branches of Christianity (most today hold the doctine of the Trinity, but many reject it, e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Scientists, etc). Many reject my belief that the Bible is a hacked together mess that passed through far too many hands and insist it's infallible (and everything in between).

My point here isn't to push my view of Christianity, but to demonstrate that your comment over-simplifies the issue.