this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
88 points (95.8% liked)

Games

32949 readers
1029 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Vampire -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, but my point is that good exclusives mean people buy both, not switch over or choose only one. The 360 era was like this where many had two consoles instead of only one.

[–] simple 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most people don't have money for both, so it usually does mean choosing one or the other for the average consumer.

[–] The_Vampire 0 points 2 years ago

I disagree. They're very expensive systems to be sure, but the real reason people don't have both is because, as is my point, one system just isn't very good in terms of exclusives. If the exclusives were better you would see people buying both, that's the whole issue and point.

While there are plenty of people who don't have the budget for both machines, there are plenty of people who do, plenty enough to sustain a console. Everything costs money, but that doesn't mean there's no such things as monopolies just because everything is competing for your money.