Programmer Humor

19623 readers

76 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

515

I know I should... but I just really don't wanna (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really hate the projects I work on where they've overtested to the point of meaninglessness. Like every single class has a full suite of tests mocking every single dependency and it's impossible to look at it without breaking 50 test cases.

Similarly I hate the projects with no tests because I can't change anything and be sure I've not broken some use-case I didn't think about.

Much prefer the middle ground with modular, loosely coupled code and just enough tests to cover all the use cases without needing to mock every single little thing. It should be possible to refactor without breaking tests.

[–] d0m 1 points 1 year ago

For real. I have been using DI to only mock infra and external services while keeping the actual code unmocked, and using an in memory db (we use Dynamodb so that's easy) for testing. I write tests only at the interface level, send data in, mock infra, external services, and then assert side effects. Found this to work very well for now, especially for Lambdas which we have quite a lot of.

Whenever we encounter a bug, we ensure that that case is captured in a unit test as well, but priority on integration tests.