this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
498 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60110 readers
3526 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
498
Republicans slam broadband discounts for poor people, threaten to kill program (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Republicans slam broadband discounts for poor people, threaten to kill program::Thune, Cruz complain that $30 discounts go to people who "already had broadband."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Should be higher. $60/mo. tax credit for broadband plus $2,000 every 3 years for tech gear.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's more then I spend for my household on "tech gear" every 3 years, including cellular devices. I am far from any line that would qualify me for a program... seems excessive.

I agree with the bump to $60, $30 is a good subsidy like a decade + ago.

[–] Kbobabob 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is the money supposed to completely pay for it or is it a subsidy? If it's a subsidy then $30 seems fine. High speed Internet at around $50 seems pretty common.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Idk. Where I live the cheapest option is like $65. I think one company offers 10mb for less, but for obvious reasons I haven't switched to that.

[–] AA5B 3 points 1 year ago

I thought there was a companion requirement that providers must offer a plan that is fully covered.