this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
3 points (66.7% liked)

RealTesla

476 readers
1 users here now

  1. Posts must be about Tesla, EV, or AV
  2. Meta Posts must be pre-approved.
  3. Shitposts are limited
  4. No Elon Worship
  5. All Links must include the original title of the Content
  6. Sites behind Paywalls must have text included.
  7. Don't be an asshole
  8. No Image Posts

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dragontamer
[email protected]
3
Ram, Tesla and Subaru Have the Worst Drivers | LendingTree (www.lendingtree.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by dragontamer to c/realtesla
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I posted the Forbes article that's nothing but a link to this article instead.

Meta: Based on how Lemmy works (IE: articles that get cross-posted link to each other sub-communities), I'm thinking that we might want to err on posting more articles on this software? Anyone have an opinion on this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragontamer 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Insurance companies don't care about causality. Correlation is good enough for insurance. They don't need the root cause, they just need to know how much it all costs at the end of the day.

From my perspective, this is a correlation that utterly destroys Tesla's claims of autopilot and/or FSD being "safer" for drivers though. Correlation is certainly not causation, but its difficult to prove causation when the correlations are inverted from the thesis.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, I know. I’m a scientist and I care about causality.

Also, people love to make causal inferences from data like these about BMW drivers being jerks or whatever.

When I first moved out to CA I ran across a random news article about a guy wrapping his just-purchased lambo around a tree on a twisty mountain road, killing himself and his passenger. I think the naive causal inference (too much car for his level of experience) is probably pretty safe. When dealing with highly aggregated, wide ranging, and deliberately assembled stats, we just need to exercise more caution.

Plus, I needed an excuse to post my joke.