this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
67 points (85.3% liked)

Programming

17313 readers
277 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A friendly programming language from the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think that when it comes to functional programming with effect systems, unison is currently the closest to showing how it is actually done. Koka and languages like Effekt are of course very nice, but they don't show much going for them besides the example nondeterminism and exception effect. Verse, that language that was going to be used as Fortnite's scripting language, also plans on adding these effect systems a la Koka.

Overall, I think one of 2 things will happen:

  • unison will slowly gain more and more adoption and grow out to become a formidable niche language
  • Verse will blow unison out of the water and everyone who once even considered unison will be moving to Verse instead
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

unison is currently the closest to showing how it is actually done

What makes you say that? As far as I'm aware, even the theoretical soundness of it isn't a done deal (this is a harder nut to crack than e.g. rust's borrow checker)

Overall, I think one of 2 things will happen:

In this niche, perhaps, I don't believe any of those will gain mainstream adoption (though I hope I'm wrong)