this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
516 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59448 readers
3553 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
516
TikTok requires users to “forever waive” rights to sue over past harms (arstechnica.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Except in several states if any of the contract is invalid it all is.

[–] NateNate60 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In the United States where TikTok is based, contracts can include "severability clauses" that state that in the event any part of the contract is deemed unenforceable, the other parts are still good

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Uhhh tiktok is based in China

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

it's owned by a Chinese company, but TikTok itself is based in the US

[–] ABCDE 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't there a big hoohar about that a couple of years ago which meant they had to move?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Corporate:'I'm sorry you were looking for an issue with tik tok. the problem is. tik tok is not the issue.'

due to dividends untold tik tok just money guns politicians in the cooter till they spazzin...

[–] ABCDE 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Wasn't there a big hoohar about that a couple of years ago which meant they had to move?

My Comment In gest " we investigated ourselves and found there to be nothing wrong, also we gave money to policy makers."

did you forget what you typed above? was my comment so far left field?

[–] ABCDE 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have no idea what the "due to..." sentence means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

due to dividend untold...due to money with unlimited wallet depth.

that better?

[–] lhx 13 points 11 months ago

That’s not a common thing in American contracts. Severability clauses take care of that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is that true? I can't find any source for it, except very specific cases where the language and contents of the contract matter.

[–] jeansburger 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

IANAL; However Usually the contracts have a severability clause, meaning even if some parts of that contract are null and void the rest of it stands minus the parts that are illegal. Does that mean those clauses are also null and void depending on locality? Again IANAL, but I believe it's pretty settled contract law at least in the US.