this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1086 points (94.1% liked)

RPGMemes

9591 readers
882 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another player who was at the table during the incident sent me this meme after the problem player in question (they had a history) left the group chat.

Felt like sharing it here because I'm sure more people should keep this kind of thing in mind.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] c0mbatbag3l 1 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Once you establish a baseline for how that fictional world functions, any deviation from it causes issues with the suspension of disbelief.

Your argument is the same one people have been using for years to deflect any and all criticisms when writers fail to keep up with their own world building or are just too damn lazy to care.

[–] BigBlackCockroach 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

First of all not all parts of a fictional universe have to have the same level of technological advancements. Within that baseline you can do whatever you want it's fiction. Also the reader or audience doesn't know everything there is about the world and might have gaps of knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The argument you're defending is that a fantasy world doesn't need to have any realism, yet you're defending it by coming up with reasons why this fantasy world is actually realistic.

[–] BigBlackCockroach 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

there are a lot of inconsistencies, why are people only focused on the ones that allow people with wheelchair to identify with the main character or whatever?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Who are you talking about? What the OP said was :

I don't have a problem with having disabled people in a TTRPG setting, but I hate the "it's fantasy, stop whining about realism" argument.

You came along, not to say anything about disabled people in RPGs, but to defend the claim "it's fantasy, stop whining about realism".

This isn't about disabilities, it's about dismissing any and all criticisms of fantasy simply because fantasy isn't the real world.

Fantasy, like any genre of fiction, is of course, made up, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have any rules. Each fantasy world establishes its own rules, and tries to follow it as best as it can, because that makes the worlds consistent, and more believable. Does that mean those rules can never be broken? No. But you need to come up with a reason why.

That's all this is about, coming up with reasons why things exist/happen, that's the core of fiction. If you have a reason why disabled people still exist in your games despite healing magic, that's awesome, keep at it. If you don't, i mean... You do you, but don't go complaining when people complain about it, they're not ableists (not necessarily at least), they just don't like bad writing.

You literally came up with a ton of reasons why disabled people can exist in a fantasy setting, so i don't understand why you're so against the idea.

[–] BigBlackCockroach 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I didn't mean for you to get upset. I just think that the writer for example of a script has a lot of power to mold things how they want and I feel the only limitation should be that it is entertaining and tells a great story. Of course within whatever system you choose for your univers that should be consistent but we both agree that other than that you can freely pick and choose what the rules of that system are. Again no offense meant 😇 😅

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

look, sorry if it came out that way, but i'm not upset. I just found it funny that you were basically like:

"We don't need explanations for things in fantasy, here are some explanations for this thing in fantasy"

I think we're ultimately in agreement here despite the nitpicking though, so have a good day.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)