this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
923 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

11414 readers
2142 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
923
poggers (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] stevar 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've always seen it explained as (100+0) + (99+1) + (98+2) + (97+3) + ...

So you basically have 50 pairs of numbers that all equal 100. So 5000 right? But there is one number that doesnt have a pair to make 100. Which is 50. Obviously there arent two 50s to make 100. So its added by itself. 5050.

Its the same as the summation of 1 to 10. (0+10) + (1+9) + (2+8) + (3+7) + (4+6) + 5. Its 55.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is how I used to think about it too, back when I didn't even know what a natural number was