this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
426 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“The temporary restraining order granted by the Travis County district judge purporting to allow an abortion to proceed will not insulate hospitals, doctors or anyone else from civil and criminal liability for violating Texas’ abortion laws,” Paxton said in a statement shortly after the judge’s decision. “This includes first degree felony prosecutions…and civil penalties of not less than $100,000 for each violation.

Paxton added, ominously: “The [judge’s temporary restraining order] will expire long before the statute of limitations for violating Texas’ abortion laws expires.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 58 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I hope he needs medical care and every doctor refuses to help. Literal monster.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

That would be nice but I don't imagine there are many doctors who would refuse to care for him, because their oath is to care for the sick and wounded and to show them compassion even if they don't deserve it.

[–] RunningInRVA 8 points 9 months ago

Ok then we need to regulate his life too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I agree that would be the most likely outcome in my fantasy scenario. However it brings to mind why are docs not helping these women when faced with jail or losing their license? If they're charged to do no harm how could they stay and practice in Texas knowing they may face a situation where they have to turn away a pregnant woman in crisis?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My guess would be that because leaving would be difficult to begin with and further if they left then the care that they could have provided may not be provided at all.

[–] jaybone 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Doctors aren’t exactly poor. It’s probably easier for them to relocate than other middle class or rather upper middle class people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you're overlooking the fact that most people have families and friends that they cannot easily abandon, which was my thinking in my post.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

yeah i hate that. "Just move thousands of miles away bro, it's easy!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Exactly, there isn't a single state in the entire USA that has an overabundance of medical professionals.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They have taken an oath to do no harm, after all. Letting him die would be a mercy to the state of Texas. Literally would save countless lives.

[–] jaybone 4 points 9 months ago

I’m sure they just replace him with someone equally shitty.