this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
582 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59452 readers
3822 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
582
23andMe confirms hackers stole ancestry data on 6.9 million users (techcrunch.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s to c/technology
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

23andMe confirms hackers stole ancestry data on 6.9 million users::Genetic testing company 23andMe revealed that its data breach was much worse than previously reported, hitting about half of its total customers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nurse_Robot 34 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So I got an email today telling me that I would automatically accept their new ToS (which included barring me from class action lawsuits without 1-2 months of arbitration), but I could email them to refuse the change and keep the old ToS. I emailed them to refuse the change, was that a mistake?

[–] abhibeckert 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I find it hard to believe "not responding to an email" is consent. I mean they can write that in an email but there's no way they could hold you to that in court.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If the original contract has provisions for changing it in this manner then it might hold up in court. But of they didn't have the foresight to include mandatory arbitration to begin with that's unlikely the lawyers who drafted it thought that far ahead.

What I'm curious about is if my brother's DNA was stolen. Do I have the right to sue for negligent handling of data that's as much his as mine?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would think so. IANAL but I'm sure there's a ton of precedence for cases similar to this. HIPAA laws are very good for the people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I hadn't considered HIPAA. IANAL either but I have taken business law 101 as well as human services classes that both covered it.

If I remember right though, HIPAA isn't a personal lawsuit. It's the feds suing corporations for violations. I can't like, personally sue the health industry for a violation (as far as I remember).

[–] blazeknave 1 points 11 months ago

It's typical in software.

[–] Haha 10 points 11 months ago

No

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Not a mistake, but their ToS change without consent probably wouldn't stand up in court.