this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
644 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59607 readers
3417 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New study finds bots and fraud farms responsible for 73% of web traffic::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The headline stat is a misinterpretation of the study

and 76% of activity on the login/account creation was malicious.

Are you assuming though that that's 76%, once they've created an account, would do no fuether interaction with the Internet after that?

I'm not sure of the point that you're trying to make?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You think these bots are streaming movies and music? 73% of Internet traffic is not bots. It's all YouTube, Netflix, Insta, TikTok, Spotify, etc media consumption. 73% of login traffic may be bots, but it's a teeny drop of global traffic.

[–] CosmicCleric 0 points 11 months ago

73% of login traffic may be bots, but it’s a teeny drop of global traffic.

So you are assuming they're just logging in and not doing anything else, yes?

That there are no bots that (for example) watch YouTube videos and then gives them a like up or down, depending how they've been paid to do so, etc?

[–] Syrc 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Well, I mean, if a bot protection company found malicious activity in account creation, I’m assuming they stopped the account from completing it…?

[–] CosmicCleric -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m assuming they stopped the account from completing it…?

They could have let it continue to monitor it, in a honey-pot sort of way, to learn more about the bot, and it's network.

But I was asking towards intent, not success. Why would people have bots create accounts and then do absolutely nothing with those accounts afterwards?

[–] Syrc 2 points 11 months ago

I mean, that commenter said the headline was a misinterpretation because it's not 73% of web traffic, but only account creation attempts.

If the attempts are stopped, and the bot fails in creating an account, it isn't able to post/comment/do whatever it needed to do, and isn't contributing to "web traffic" as much as the other 27% of real people (or, well, uncaught bots).