this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
480 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

60115 readers
4479 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NOSin 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I don't want to give credit to Apple, but let's not forget that De Niro is anti vax, among others bullshit he have spewed over the years

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

I honestly don't care what the guy had to say. Removing parts from his speech without telling him is plain awful.

[–] ElPussyKangaroo 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait... He is? I don't follow news about celebrities as often and only watch movies and shows, maybe some interviews.

[–] Wrench 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah... honestly don't blame them for cutting an unhinged rant out of their awards show speeches. But if they did it without informing him, or explicitly approved it to get him to commit, and bait and switched, then yeah, they're in the wrong.

It did make it far more entertaining, though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kameecoding 5 points 1 year ago

actually it's ad hominem,

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

[–] jacktherippah 2 points 1 year ago

Also had a kid this year at 80.

[–] Haha 1 points 1 year ago

Why does him being antivaxx matter lol he should be saying what h wants not he controlled.