Asklemmy

44151 readers

1739 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

130

Speakers of non-English languages, what common mistakes do native speakers make that drive you crazy? (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For example, English speakers commonly mix up your/you're or there/their/they're. I'm curious about similar mistakes in other languages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Maram 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Loose and lose. I just don't get it. I can understand when the words sound the same, like with the yours and the theirs but Loose and Lose don't sound the same. Like reading loose out loud in those sentences where it should be lose just sounds stupid.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I think it's because English isn't super consistent with the spelling of vowel sounds. Consider also "choose" (rhymes with "lose") and "chose" (which doesn't rhyme with either).

I guess really the vowel sound in loose/lose is basically the same; the difference is whether or not the "s" makes a "s" sound or a "z" sound... It is admittely odd that the presence or absence of an extra "o" would affect the sound of an adjacent constant (especially when we have a perfectly good "z" character available).

Which reminds me of my pet peeve: when people use "breath" or "cloth" instead of "breathe" or "clothe".

[–] nixcamic 2 points 1 year ago

There's no phonetic reason, the double oo and single o make the exact same sound in most dialects and there's no reason the s should sound like a z in lose.