this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
23 points (92.6% liked)

Formula 1

8986 readers
116 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ Singapore 20-22 Sep
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 18-20 Oct
πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ Mexico 25-27 Oct
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Brazil 01-03 Nov
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21-23 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
23
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by wes to c/formula1
 

ROUND 23: Abu Dhabi πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ


FORMULA 1 ETIHAD AIRWAYS ABU DHABI GRAND PRIX 2023


Circuit stats


  • First Grand Prix: 2009
  • Number of laps: 58
  • Circuit Length: 5.281 km
  • Race Distance: 306.183 km
  • Lap record: 1:26.103 Max Verstappen (2021)
  • 2022 winner: Max Verstappen

Track Map


Image

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

My thinking is the opposite: with no major rules changes I don't see a reason why RB should lose any of their advantage. They've had the luxury of being able to switch focus to next year since May already and by now we're past the period where they were hit with the overspend development penalty.

I would love Ferrari or McLaren or Mercedes or Aston to be able to challenge next year, but I'm honestly assuming the next time we can hope to see a fight for the championship is '26.

Keep in mind that Max is so good that for a battle for first place to happen he either needs to have a teammate that is almost equal (not going to happen) or a car that is actually not equal but slightly slower than his challenger.

I can't imagine that happening without a major rules shakeup (and even then it would require Newey to get things wrong which - let's be honest - is also unlikely).

It's not unrealistic to think this dynasty will last until Max decides he's had enough of F1.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They've had the luxury of being able to switch focus to next year since May already.

Well between the penalty and the fact that they naturally get less time because of their championship position, teams like McLaren would have had almost 50% more testing time. This and the fact that updates on this year's car carry over to the next in my opinion nullify the advantage RB got from stopping upgrades early. What is an issue for other teams is that with the design team that RB has, I back them to make better improvements than the others even if the testing time allocated for next year by all the teams is the same

[–] DV8 2 points 9 months ago

It's the Mercedes era all over again. The dominant design formula is determined and everybody is a year behind the team the came up with the formula.

It'll become closer and closer so Red Bull need a strong second driver so they can't lose on strategy.