this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
6 points (80.0% liked)

Photography

4559 readers
71 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

#photo #monochrome #oldbuildings #art #mnartists

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joshuawmurray 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd love to find a small digital rangefinder with a larger lens to carry everywhere with me. 25 years ago I always carried Grandpa's Yashica Lynx 14e and 4 rolls of Tri-X with me "just in case". It was fun.

I like how the approach to black and white photography is different from color. For B&W I concentrate on contrast and form as well as the subject but with color my focus is on saturation and the 'shape' of color. I don't think information is thrown away. I think it's about working with the strengths and parameters of the medium.

Or sometimes it's just play. Astronomatopoeia is play.

[–] KevinFRK 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure you don't suffer from this problem (especially as you recognise B&W needs a different approach), but I came across too many photos where it was clear the photographer had just presented their shot as B&W because that's "Artistic" (and no other reason) while there was almost certainly good colour in the scene they took a photo of - it's those cases where I see it as throwing away information.

[–] joshuawmurray 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahhh yes! I know exactly what you mean. You can see "artistic" talent right away. I think it comes from a lack of art education or inexperience or you've encountered a marketing rep. But then again, we've all put out art because that's what we thought art is supposed to be.

Here's a question I ask my artist friends from time to time: can you instinctively see or notice high art / low art, more talent / less talent regardless of finished work? And, considering your answer, do you think there's a universal aesthetic in which everyone can agree that there is definitely good art and bad art?

[–] KevinFRK 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's good art if it satisfies the soul of its creator ... if it satisfies anyone else, that's just a side benefit.

[–] joshuawmurray 1 points 1 year ago