Enough Musk Spam

2210 readers

96 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

jordanpeterson

[email protected]

Musk files lawsuit claiming Media Matters manipulated X by scrolling down (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/enoughmuskspam

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In lawsuit, Musk says ads next to antisemitic posts are Media Matters' fault.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So I guess X is past the “deny there was antisemitic content” stage.

Also, the hot take from Ken Paxton

Paxton claimed to be "extremely troubled by the allegations that Media Matters, a radical anti-free speech organization, fraudulently manipulated data on X.com."

Freedom to do what, Ken?

[–] paddirn 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, reading through the article, it's a weird set of mental gymnastics they're going through to argue the case. They're saying that Media Matters basically created an account specifically for the purposes of seeing hate speech content and refreshing it so much that these major advertisers eventually showed up next to the hate speech content. They're not even acting like it's an issue that the hate speech is on there in the first place, it's just sort of like a given, "Of course we host hate speech, so what?" The problem that they're arguing is that the average user likely wouldn't see this, which doesn't seem like that's what Media Matters was saying, MM just presented it as, "This has the possibility of happening on twitter/X." As long as they're the ones allowing hate speech on their site, they're creating opportunities for these ad placement situations to happen in the first place, MM just pointed it out.