this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
507 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
5896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
507
The FCC can now punish telecom providers for charging customers more for less (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The FCC can now punish telecom providers for charging customers more for less::The Federal Communications Commission has passed new digital discrimination rules that hold telecom providers accountable for not providing equal internet access.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Ottomateeverything 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TL;DR: Intersectionality is a thing and forcing the separation of intertwined issues is counterproductive as well as unjust.

Yeah, okay, enough of this pedantic bullshit. We're all aware. You're not dropping some grand unknown knowledge. You keep making sweeping arguments about some general scheme, instead of you know, the conversation at hand.

Such bad strategy, in fact, that it was probably the biggest reason within the campaign's control that Bernie Sanders didn't become president in stead of Trump.

Yeah. That's definitely it. There's definitely not a whole slew of other things here.

You've clearly made the only real point you had here, and have gone off the deep end. This isn't really productive anymore. Nor has it been because of a staunch refusal to read what's going on.

[โ€“] Viking_Hippie 0 points 1 year ago

You keep making sweeping arguments about some general scheme, instead of you know, the conversation at hand.

No, I'm responding to first someone who claimed that it wasn't about race at all and now you misrepresenting that as me saying that it's ONLY about race.

I'm not widening the perspective to be histrionic, I'm putting it into a general context to make it easier for you to understand what I'm ACTUALLY saying.

There's definitely not a whole slew of other things here

Good job ignoring qualifiers. Saying that it was the biggest problem with the campaign within its own control is in NO WAY the same thing as saying it was the only one, or even the only one within the control of the campaign itself.

I'm not being a pedant, I'm correcting your bad faith/lack of reading comprehension interpretation of what I'm saying.

If you don't understand by now, after I've been very clear over many more paragraphs than should have been necessary or than I wanted to, you never will and we might as well stop here.