Privacy

31609 readers

325 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

How bad is TPM on a laptop for privacy? (self.privacy)

submitted 11 months ago by wAkawAka to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are some speculations about TPM uncontrollably sending data to manufacturer servers if a laptop has any Internet connection. Others say it's not intended/capable of that, like this answer for example (which is 5 years old though).

Lemmy, what do you say?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] marcos 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The TPM doesn't do anything by itself.

But if Windows is sending all of your data, including stored files and passwords for some third party like its TOS says it can, than that's Windows breaching your privacy. Or if the remote management hardware that comes with every computer is allowing some third party to access it with more capabilities than even you have, like they are normally designed, than that's your CPU's manufacturer breaching your privacy (but those are supposed to be turned off).

But again, the TPM by itself doesn't do anything.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

deleted

[–] marcos 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are looking at the wrong place. The TPM is a very standard piece of hardware, that shouldn't even need firmware (it would completely cancel the entire point of it). It enables a whole lot of shit, but it isn't the thing that does the shit.

Now, you can go look at the always-on network enabled uncontrollable management unity that exists inside your computer's processor... Intel pinky swears they can't access them in any way and will only activate them if you pay extra¹; AMD AFAIK doesn't even try to say anything.

1 - Makes sense to you? Well, how do they activate it if they can't access it?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

deleted