this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
201 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

58097 readers
3037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rolling_resistance -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

“environmentally friendly car”

Removing tailpipe exhaust doesn't automatically make cars environmentally-friendly.

edit: https://mander.xyz/post/6008655

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wat? You sure understand what hydrogen is?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The fuckcars community has their nose so far up their ass, they think any kind of personal transportation is the devils spawn and no amount of improvents will fix that. In their eyes, everyone should be forced to live in dense urban environments and ride some kind of shared public transportation everywhere.

There are good talking points in their propaganda, for sure, but just like everything today, the echo chamber is so strong, they are now extremists on the matter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

yeah even as someone that really likes PT I think the fuckcars community is a pretty bad community that just simps for the new shiny thing rather than talking about things that actually improves PT.

Still, suburbia should stop being subsidised and more transit oriented systems should be built.

[–] Phlogiston 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The extremes always look silly. Take for example the little dick energy of a big lifted pickup with tiny wheels blowing coal.

Where the fuckcars folks are correct is that many many car drivers claim they NEED some monstrously fast, big, powerful, etc vehicle and to drive too fast, take up lots of room, crush people, look “cool” etc to go a few miles to buy some milk.

Any rural town with a speed limit near a school knows that when people get into their cars a lot of excuses for why they need a car become armor for why they need to be allowed to drive like dicks.

I don’t think we’d see fuckcars have nearly the staying power if those people were driving sensible vehicles at sensible speeds and didn’t claim priority over every piece of road.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Totally agree with this although it's a uniquely an american problem. In my neck of the woods, cars are more sensible and I would still say there's a lot more room for improvement, both in what people are alowed to take on the roads and public transportation options.

But the circlejerk that is fuckcars makes even the people driving the Renault Twizy seem like monsters.

[–] sugartits 1 points 10 months ago

You've basically just summed up Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

A fuel that is notoriously hard to contain and usually produced using fossil fuels, using inefficient production methods that waste electricity.

Anyway, the commenter you're replying to is more referring to the pollution from tires and the noise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And the death. Don’t forget the animal and human cost of everyone having a car.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

The animals and people killed by vehicles. The environmental impact those animal deaths can have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

usually produced using fossil fuels, using inefficient production methods that waste electricity

Well, it's either one or the another. While the energy loss is relatively high when using electricity, it's not a problem when you have an oversupply of renewable energy, actually it's even beneficial as it provides a storage for otherwise lost energy.
But regardless of the production, it generates no pollution when consumed by a vehicle. You know, like clean air in cities.

And of course, hydrogen won't solve tire pollution nor associated noise (albeit I guess it should be more silent that fossil fuel one) but it's still environmental friendly compared to what we have now.

[–] Pipoca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sprawl itself is also pretty terrible for the environment.

And it's hard to build sprawling towns that don't rely on cars, and hard to build dense towns where everyone drives everywhere.