this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
501 points (95.5% liked)

Gay: News, Memes and Discussion

1903 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/Gay - Your LGBTQ+ Haven

We're more than just a community; we're your haven for celebrating LGBTQ+ culture and connecting with like-minded individuals.

Community Rules:

~ 1. No bigotry. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 4. Keep it LGBTQ+ related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love posts but 3-4 in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WaxedWookie 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't being that insecure stereotypically feminine behaviour - ya know... Kinda gay?

If you want to be gay, be gay. If you want to be a bit gay, be a bit gay. if you don't, that's totally fine too - Just stop worrying about crossing some arbitrary line into... what?

If cleaning up after yourself leads to you railing some dude, the cleaning up was never the problem, and maybe you just opened yourself up to something wonderful.

[–] FishFace 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sounds like you're trying to apply reason to the perception of behaviour as masculine, feminine, straight or gay, and the perception of those categorisations as positive or negative.

That is misguided :)

[–] WaxedWookie 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm just applying the same type of nonsensical stereotypes this group will display to show that this is gay behaviour too, and the entire discussion is moronic. I say this as a cishet guy that went to a boys school and heard all this nonsense regularly.

Just clean up your shit - if that somehow leads you to discover your love of men, roll with it... you were almost certainly always gay, and that's something to embrace not fear.

[–] FishFace -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but "applying the same type of stereotypes" is an example of trying to reason about this kind of thinking which can't be done. You see a parallel between worrying about something silly like how you're perceived for being green, and other stereotypically feminine behaviours - but prejudiced people don't see or don't care about that parallel.

[–] WaxedWookie 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those prejudiced people aren't likely to be browsing !/gay - my comments weren't for their benefit.

Do you think you're having more success bringing prejudiced people around in here than I am, or do you think there might be reasons to post here that aren't for the benefit of the prejudiced?

[–] FishFace 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you think there might be reasons to post here that aren’t for the benefit of the prejudiced?

Sure, but I don't know what you're getting at.

[–] WaxedWookie 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're not posting for the benefit of the prejudiced, there's no particular need to...

reason about this kind of thinking which can't be done.

...or worry that

prejudiced people don't see or don't care about that parallel.

[–] FishFace 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My understanding was exactly that you were reasoning about that kind of thinking - hence the start of that sentence, "It sounds like you’re trying to apply reason..." ;) If not I don't understand your original comment!

[–] WaxedWookie 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More a case of applying their rationale to demonstrate that it's not based in reason.

[–] FishFace 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough. It certainly isn't - but I think it's worth understanding and emphasising that prejudice is never based on reason.

[–] WaxedWookie 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I generally agree, but would also argue that adopting and showcasing their broken reasoning is more effective than simply saying they're not basing their views in reason. It also has other benefits...

  • For example, if you speak to a Nazi, they'll accurately point to disproportionate Jewish representation in banking and media. There's a (ultimately irrelevant) factual point underpinning their bullshit, and my approach avoids the need to track back through their endless layers of bullshit and misinterpreted nuggets of truth to prove the lack of reason.

  • It's concise, and means you don't need to wade through the ghish gallop of nonsense

  • The ridicule pokes at the key motivator of non-reason-focused people - emotions

  • The slight edginess appeals to reactionaries, who tend to view progressives as fragile little snowflakes they'd never align with.

  • It's more entertaining.

[–] FishFace 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mmm, makes sense. I will look out for when people are showing inconsistent reasoning rather than arguing with it.

[–] WaxedWookie 1 points 1 year ago

Diversity of tactics 😉

[–] MrSlicer 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand your first line at all.