this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
202 points (98.1% liked)

worldnews

4851 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dx1 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The majority of that money (FMF) comes from our taxes, goes to Israel, Israel is bound to spend it on arms from American arms companies, the owners (stockholders) of those companies get the profits, cycle some of it back to politicians and lobbyists, etc. So it's a net gain for the beneficiaries, but a net loss for the rest of the population. It also makes our infrastructure more targeted towards arms production and less for our own needs. There isn't an additional inflow of money, so that essentially means a net loss.

That's essentially the broken window fallacy on one hand, and actual redistribution of wealth upwards on the other hand.