this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
449 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59984 readers
2767 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
449
College Students Dump Dating Apps as Bumble CEO Steps Down (gizmodo.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Salamendacious to c/technology
160 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

‘It’s not you, it’s me’ is the gist of college student qualms with dating apps. Hook-up culture declines while young people search for genuine connection.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then it should be the other way around "CEO forced to step down as college students aren't using the app anymore", the latter caused the former.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Notice how you have to add the ""is forced to" to make even the "reverse" say what you want. I agree that it isnt a great title, but the "as" indicates things happening at the same time, not necessarily the former causing the latter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbh I just wrote it from memory as I'm on my phone: Bumble CEO steps down as college students dump dating apps

And I have to disagree, it definitely is a causality thing in a weird way, sure they happen at the same time-ish but it implies a connection between the former and the latter — the latter being used as a reference point around which the former is explained to have happened.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong, it's a shitty title that could be more clear and I can absolutely see how you can infer that conclusion. But the fact that when you reversed it you had to add "is forced to" to drive home the point just kind of proves my point how weak the inference that the former caused the latter is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I rewrote it in the comment you just replied to based on the accurate wording 😅

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

lol. I didn't even realize you had rewritten it again. Further driving home the point that the order makes little difference.