this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
705 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

59474 readers
5174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
705
Hey tech billionaires, if you want to talk about radical change, let’s abolish venture capitalism (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/technology
153 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Do you support sustainability, social responsibility, tech ethics, or trust and safety? Congratulations, you’re an enemy of progress. That’s according to the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MajorHavoc 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For 10 million and up, you're exactly right.

But let's not forget that the vast majority of multimillionaires are a retiree, out there minding their own business spending down their 2 or 3 million in savings buying breakfast at senior discount restaurants and driving a three year old luxury sedan with heated seats, back to a forgettable house in the suburbs.

Retiring with a couple million dollars is becoming commonplace, and it's about the right number to retire with, in certain places, to leave almost nothing behind at death.

Being a multimillionaire is not "endless wealth".

We need the multimillionaires on our side if we're going to beat back the perversions perpetrated by the billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was really important that you highlighted the fact that anyone who has somewhere between 2 million and 999 million is technically called a multimillionaire so you could go on about retirees on the extreme low end instead of the obvious use in the context as someone who has 10s or 100s of millions of dollars. Crucial information that was completely relevant and not a completely pointless side track.

Very important, good stuff. Keep up the good work.

[–] MajorHavoc -2 points 1 year ago

Words matter. You're using yours poorly.