this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
472 points (87.7% liked)

World News

39143 readers
3208 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People are used to seeing stark warnings on tobacco products alerting them about the potentially deadly risks to health. Now a study suggests similar labelling on food could help them make wiser choices about not just their health, but the health of the planet.

The research, by academics at Durham University, found that warning labels including a graphic image – similar to those warning of impotence, heart disease or lung cancer on cigarette packets – could reduce selections of meals containing meat by 7-10%.

It is a change that could have a material impact on the future of the planet. According to a recent YouGov poll, 72% of the UK population classify themselves as meat-eaters. But the Climate Change Committee (CCC), which advises the government on its net zero goals, has said the UK needs to slash its meat consumption by 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2050, in order to meet them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we are better off eating/using what is produced on farmlands directly

we do. what we feed to animals is mostly the parts of plants that people can't or won't eat.

[–] jose1324 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's just not true lmao. 90% of soy production is for animals. Not humans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

85% of all soy is put into an oil press. the byproduct of oil production is called soycake or soy meal.

that makes up the vast majority of the soy that is fed to animals.

[–] jose1324 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So... What i said? Lmao what trap card. Your source doesn't say anything about "soy humans can't eat". It's just normal ass soy pushed into soy cakes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"soy cake" is the industrial waste from the production of soybean oil. exactly what i said. also, your estimate of how much soy ends up as animal feed was off by a lot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

85% of all soybeans are pressed for oil for people. that can't be true if 90% of soy production is for livestock. but i have the facts on my side. i'll accept your apology any time.

[–] jose1324 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ever heard of hyperbole? Lmao you can wait for a long time then. Here: https://images.app.goo.gl/UHHT7e7RxAhLVpCC9

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was right. you are wrong. it's not a matter of hyperbole. you were lying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the oil is 20% of the bean. the oil is 50% of the value of the bean. the soybean meal is a by-product of oil processing. if we didn't feed it to animals it would almost entirely be wasted.

[–] jose1324 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Jesus can you write one comment lol. Obsessed af. So by your own words there is 80% bean left, which we literally eat in the form of tofu for example. Your 50% value is abirtrary af aswell.

We literally farm more soy purely to feed livestock, which is retarded.

Bro even your own damn source with that image says: "But, only a small percentage of global soy is used for these products. More than three-quarters (77%) of soy is used as feed for livestock."

So no, it's not waste. It's most of the goddamn soy.

I'm not replying anymore, this convo is too stupid

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We literally farm more soy purely to feed livestock, which is retarded.

no, we don't. we farm soy because it rotates with corn and fixates nutrients. we also put 85% of the beans through an oil press to get the oil. only 7% is given directly to animals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Bro even your own damn source with that image says:

i know what my source says, but do you understand what it means?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So by your own words there is 80% bean left, which we literally eat in the form of tofu for example.

no, we don't. some people eat soycake or soycake products, but very few. tofu is not made from soycake.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m not replying anymore, this convo is too stupid

bye

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Your 50% value is abirtrary af aswell.

no, it's not. it's the market value.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

you've activated my trap card

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

soy is my favorite example