this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
789 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59712 readers
5740 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Devouring 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Use http://grayjay.app

EDIT: I'm fascinated by the childishness of those who are complaining about the $10. Not only you don't have to pay it, and not only that it's open source, and not only the intentions are clear on why it's not a permissive license made to fight filling average Joe with malware like always being done with NewPipe and others on Play Store, but also you can pick your poison. Would you like google to win this dumb war on ad blockers? Or would you like to support non-perfect people making FOSS apps for your benefit? I really don't get you, guys. Pick your battles! Take the win and shut up for once!

[–] linearchaos 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see there's a lot of negativity around GrayJay and their licensing and I don't disagree; but there's a battle going on here It's Google against the world. Having private paid entities working on this alongside the FOSS efforts is definitely not a bad thing. The fact that they're running source available means that other people can look at what they're doing even if they can't use their code directly.

[–] wmassingham 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can use the code directly. The license allows "review, compilation and non-commercial distribution".

It doesn't explicitly allow modification, but they do define "code" as "the code and any part of it and any derivative of it", so clearly derivatives are expected.

[–] linearchaos 0 points 1 year ago

You "can" use the code directly.

But if you don't you're not bound by their license and can foss your work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This must be the worst recommendation I've seen here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] linearchaos 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is at least source available. I prefer they didn't use the license they're using but it's there right to do so.

For mobile it's between using revanced, Grayjay or brave. At the moment I'm willing to use any one of the three that works on a given day.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On Android there's also NewPipe and LibreTube

[–] linearchaos 1 points 1 year ago

They are all welcome.

However, almost all these guys are using the same libraries under the hood. When Google breaks one you're probably going to break most of them leaving us all scrambling to find the next way.

[–] Withloveandloathing -1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely good suggestion. Please check this out. Louis Rossman has a really in depth video with more information about the app on his channel

[–] matteblack -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...If you have Android and $10 to throw at the problem.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Theres also NewPipe its free and open source

[–] Devouring 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For the record, payment is optional.