this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
128 points (91.0% liked)

Google

1097 readers
12 users here now

Welcome to the Google community! This is a place to discuss everything related to Google products, services, features, and discussions.

ChromeOS discussions are welcome!

General discussions about Google products, updates, tips, and related topics are welcome. However, for specific technical support, account-related inquiries, advertising questions, and other issues, please direct them to official Google support channels.

Rules
  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to Google products, services, or the Google ecosystem.
  2. Respectful discussions: Treat fellow community members with respect and engage in constructive discussions. Avoid personal attacks, harassment, or offensive language.
  3. No support inquiries: Please refrain from posting individual support inquiries or account-related issues. Use official Google support channels for assistance.
  4. No spam or self-promotion: Do not post spam or self-promotional content. This includes links to personal websites, blogs, or products/services.
  5. No illegal content: Do not share or discuss illegal content, including piracy, hacking, or copyright infringement.
  6. No misleading information: Avoid spreading false or misleading information about Google or its products.
  7. No inappropriate content: Do not post or link to any inappropriate or NSFW (Not Safe for Work) content.
  8. No off-topic discussions: Keep the discussions focused on Google products, services, and related topics. Avoid unrelated or off-topic discussions.
  9. No excessive advertising: Do not excessively promote products, services, or websites.
  10. Follow community guidelines: Adhere to the overall community guidelines and terms of service.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krigo666 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It might actually be illegal in the EU for them to run scripts to detect ad blockers without asking permission first.

[–] weeahnn 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's why I'm really curious about how this will play out. I just hope that people will be the ones benefiting from this shitshow and not Youtube.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

YouTube is a for-profit service run by a company. If they can't make it profitable due to low premium adoption or regulation there will be less freedom to post/view stuff on there. There will be no upside for users.

Everyone should really reevaluate their stance on premium services and the value they get out of them. The time of free is over - even something like lemmy needs funding.

[–] Ottomateeverything 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So then they'll just embed them into the video, refuse to serve the video until the time is up, etc. Running clientside snooping scripts is only one way for them to enforce this. The idea that EU law will somehow force YouTube to just serving you content without ads is entirely copium.

[–] Moneo 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A black screen is infinitely less annoying than an ad. I don't see google winning this battle.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Yep, been common for sports streams where you get a notification that game is on break or something and play will resume once game starts again. Preferable over ads to me.

[–] Ottomateeverything 2 points 10 months ago

OK? That's still not Google "losing" some battle. The point was the legality of their current implementation isn't going to change whether they give in and just serve you the content like the OP was claiming

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So? Let them make those changes then. That’s additional complexity and effort. They absolutely scoped that implementation against the one they chose and chose not to do it. Forcing them to spend the effort is still meaningful.

[–] xkforce 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You really dont want them embedding ads into videos like that. There'd be no blocking them and no way to download them without the ads baked right into the video file.

[–] Moneo 4 points 10 months ago

People will figure out a sponsorblock-esque crowdsourced ad detection that auto skips everything that isn't part of the video.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

SponserBlock provides defenses against that with minor modifications.

It's been suggested that that would be an absolute last ditch effort because it trashes your ability to display targeted ads or update them without absolutely wrecking your CDNs. You also can't have the ad link to anything because that would allow the client to trivially detect and skip it.

Ad Nauseam also provides the nuclear option of downloading the ads, pretending to display them, and even pretending to click them. You might still have to wait out the delay for while the ad should be playing for the first ad, but once you get past that they can't prevent the player skipping ads without also preventing you skipping 30s of boring content.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

That’s a significantly less profitable ad model. If they wanna shoot themselves, let them