Dragon's Lair
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
291 points (97.1% liked)
RetroGaming
19686 readers
1586 users here now
Vintage gaming community.
Rules:
- Be kind.
- No spam or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It wasn’t that hard if you kept feeding it quarters. It took a lot of trial and error, but having infinite lives means it was eventually beatable.
This is the real answer. Arcade games weren't made to be beaten, they are made to extract maximum quarters. Most of these games don't even have a real "ending", and why would the devs bother? They already got your money.
It wasn't a case of "why bother," it was a case of evolution.
The original intent of arcade video games was to obtain a high score. You played until you died, and the game progressively got harder until you choked, or it hit some arbitrary limit of difficulty and went on forever, or in some infamous cases (Pacman) crashed. These video games were a conceptual extension of the arcade games that existed before: Pinball machines. Pinball games don't have an end state, you play indefinitely for a high score until you choke.
Arcade video games could have endings, and even though in the very early days they didn't: Crystal Castles was probably the first, in 1983. Even then, after reaching the "end" the game would loop so you could play it indefinitely until you died. Because that's how arcade games worked. A lot of games starting from the 1990's and beyond had endings of some description or another because they were in some way narrative based. In most cases (with the exception of some 1 on 1 fighters) you can still play another loop after the ending.