this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
198 points (96.7% liked)

Environment

288 readers
1 users here now

Your definitive source for news, information, issues and activism related to the environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dual_sport_dork 95 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Never intended for broadcast?"

So what, we just rounded up all the lads on the film crew, loaded up all the cameras and microphones and shit, got in the helicopter and flew to some remote locations and had Attenborough read the prepared script just by accident, or what? Or just for the hell of it, for a laugh?

Yeah, right.

[–] NocturnalMorning 14 points 1 year ago

"It was an intended to be an inside joke." - The BBC

[–] Womble 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IIRC (this was months ago) the episode in question wasn't commissioned by the BBC but by a third party

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would then ask how the production was insured if a 3rd party was able to commandeer BBC personnel and equipment.

[–] Wrench 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the BBC commissions film crews to go around the world and record nature / etc. Many times, each location shot has multiple storyboards they're trying to fulfill for different documentaries.

Then, that footage is available to license to be chopped up and used in any number of projects that weren't part of the original commission.

That's why you see the same footage repackaged in very different ways over the years.

So the 3rd party commission could have just been the DA narration and some short DA film clips edited over BBC content.