this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
58 points (100.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5808 readers
1034 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This looks like what they call a bifurcation point in complexity theory, the point at which a small change in the parameters of the system leads to a big qualitative change. The environment has been absorbing heat and greenhouse gases but staying relatively stable. But this year, it feels like things have suddenly shifted to a new scary equilibrium.
"Crossing a saddle point" in other areas of physics
Are we getting to the part where feedback loops start running wild?
Yep, 1.5°
yup. they started going about a decade ago when the permafrost started to melt.
Let us all watch the world burn as we see that capitalism propaganda worked just long enough for so it's almost too late now
Since we all love capitalism, I wonder if GHG and warming work like compounding in business.
A little bit might not seem like much at first, but the old chess board and rice story.
At a consistent 5% more GHG, say we get 5% more bad things in a year. Say GHG and bad things are both 100.
If you just added 5 per year for 30 years you just get 250. With compounding it is almost twice as bad at a mere 5% annual compounding. If you go with, monthly, daily, or continuous (e^x) compounding, it is even worse.
Speaking of capitalism, understanding compounding is they key to wealth. Once a person gets on the good side of it (assets vs debt) they just get richer. If you keep accumulating debt, you get poorer and poorer. Wealth inequality without government intervention is just math. Hard work, super intelligence, etc aren't as big of factors as luck and environment to have those traits or the biggest, the starting factor. Consider the prior example and run the number with a 200 starting point.