this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
190 points (75.3% liked)

Lemmy

2172 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was banned on Reddit because it is racist, hatefull and spread Conspiracies.

In my new community I expect the exclution of racist communities. It is easy now with defederation. Nazis can do whatever they want on their instances, but the instances I want to be part of should not amplify their shit and flush it into our timelines.

The instance-admin of [email protected] did not reply to my message. Big instances seem not to defederate with them.

The new TD may not be a success, the point is not to give Nazis a platform like it is happening now. Fans of TD are racists.

Where are the instances that show face against racism?

edit: to contact the admins: @donut @TheDude @smorks

edit2: @TheDude deleted the community :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 130 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Definitely better to just block the community in other instances instead of total defederation. Admins can do so pretty easily. I know beehaw is usually pretty proactive about this kind of stuff.

And yeah...fuck Donald Trump. He's fucked up the US so hard and has put our country into such a mess. I hope they nail his ass straight to jail.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Seriously. Defederation should be a last resort against spammers and outright attacks on other instances, not because you dont agree with a single community.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Historically this group has been responsible for an absolute shitload of spam and outright attacks.

I was doxxed by them. They had links to a discord group that included my full name, address, email, and phone number. There was a whole list, it's one of the first reasons they were quarantined. There was a comment that read "anyone with spare bullets can send them here".

This is a lot more than "I simply don't agree with that community". They are trash who will trash up any platform they can reach.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Defederation should be a last resort against spammers and outright attacks on other instances, not because you dont agree with a single community.

100% agree

Also, it should be noted that this 'The_Donald' community is literally just one user making posts.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Just blocking the community doesn't prevent the users in that community from harassing minorities and generally spreading disinformation and hate. It's offloading extra moderation work to every instance who federates with them. Unless that instance is also okay with fascists interacting in bad faith, of course.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It could be extra moderation work, but I think it's a bad line to cross to assume everyone on an instance is guilty before they've actually done something bad.

Bad comments can come from anywhere though and mods still have to remove them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one is saying everyone in the instance is guilty; people are saying that the instance is going to become toxic to the point where it becomes hard to tell.

If you are in that instance and don't want to tied to this rhetoric, talk to your admin about banning the Donald.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

No one is saying everyone in the instance is guilty

Defederation is basically treating them like so. I mean, I get it, moderation is hard AF, but pre-emptive defederation when we haven't even seen a ton of toxicity from sh.itjust.works yet is not a good precedent.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You've got a good point. Ultimately every instance is responsible for its users and their behavior. Harassment should not be tolerated.

SIJW needs to make a decision. IMHO it's perfectly fine to say that your instance is not prepared to deal with that kind of shit regardless of how open and accommodating you want to be.

If they believe there's a space for "moderate trump supporters" that's their decision but they are on the hook for any harassment caused by their users.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

the users in that community is one person

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes! Hold the instance owners accountable for allowing that shit to fester and be rebroadcast.

Nine people dining at a table with a Nazi means you have ten Nazis.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nine people dining at a table with a Nazi means you have ten Nazis.

This doesn't make any sense.

One of my long time friends is a genuine racist. Am I a racist then too because I'm friends with him even though our views on this topic (and many others) differ quite dramatically?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Depends. Do you just keep your silence or do you call them out when they're being shitty?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree that it depends. However such nuance was not included in the original statement. It was absolute

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Oh, no, it is absolute: if you say and do nothing, then at best, you're allowing the harm they cause to happen, and at worse reinforcing their behavior.

So yes, if you have racist friends and you sit silently then yes, you're a racist supporter.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I support defederatiom personally because it sends a stronger message from the community. Blocking the community is "I don't want to see this." Defederating is "we don't want to see this."

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, from what I've gathered, many consider the broad lesson learnt from various defederation dramas over on mastodon is that making a genuine attempt to voice concern with the instance admins prior to defederation is almost always the better way to go. It avoids drama and inconvenience while promoting a better ecosystem of cooperation between instance admins and their users.

Obviously at some point when there aren't better options and users need to be protected, use defederation, that's what it's for.

But at this point, I'd try to talk or have our admins talk to the instance admin first.

[–] finder585 23 points 2 years ago

Exactly, defederation is a nuclear option that affects everyone on both instances.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

I agree. It may help send a message that the community isn't tolerated, hopefully getting it removed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah I guess it does put pressure on instance admins to remove the offending community from their instance. I am just not sure if we want to cross that line into penalizing everybody on an instance for simply being near a bad community though. I also think doing this kind of proactive censorship also forces these people into deeper echo chambers as they get more and more isolated.

[–] guyman 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, users don't have the option to block entire instances. We need to rely on our moderating overlords to do it for us.

[–] HerrLewakaas 2 points 2 years ago

It would be pretty easy to filter content from specific instances in a Lemmy app without Lemmy explicitly supporting it on the server side. I'm working on an Android app right now, as soon as all the basic stuff is done I'll implement it.